Monday 12 March 2012

Spiced Up - Indian Cooking on Top Chef Masters

I want to study the significance of Chef Floyd Cardoz win in Season Three of Top Chef Masters to learn more about the various implications of a prize as well as the lead-up to crowning the winner of such a prestigious competition that has been touted to be America’s top award in reality TV food shows. I chose this topic because I am a fan of the Top Chef series and found many interesting points about the show and its spin-offs such as Top Chef Masters while doing research for my comparative paper.

For my expository paper, I am looking to explore the following issues: (related to the prize and food ethnicity)

  • Particular attention given to his Indian heritage
  • Case of the wrong winner – He was NOT a favorite (always second to Chef Mary Sue Milliken)
  • Won judges over with a humble dish that reflected his heritage

o Umpa – A South Indian breakfast dish made with semolina

Tuesday 14 February 2012

A Theory of Mass Culture - Magnifying the Similarities of Reality TV

For my comparative paper, I intend to use Macdonald’s article: A Theory of Mass culture to dissect and analysis components of popular reality TV series namely Survivor, Amazing Race and Paris Hilton’s New BFF.

Although these four shows seem to have very little in common other than the genre of television which they belong to, I wish to argue how each of these shows, in spite of their differences, can show the degree to which mass culture has influenced the quality of television.


In this case, my grounds of comparison would have to be the choice of the TV shows and how they relate to Macdonald’s argument as well as Prizes and Popular Culture

o Survivor: Team-followed by single player elimination, voting and challenges, prize of $1000000 and title of sole ‘survivor

o Amazing Race: Pair elimination, race challenges /teamwork, prize of $1000000

o Paris Hilton’s New BFF: prize – elevation in social status (intangible)

Thursday 12 January 2012

Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. What's from Earth?

Forgive the clichéd title. I just couldn't resist such a jibe when considering such issues. This post is about the article "Karthyn Bigelow: Feminist pioneer or tough guy in drag?"

For me, what I've read here could not be a more glaring reminder of what was discussed in class: that our perception towards things really depends on our culture, personal characteristics and interests. For example, I was completely unable to understand the metaphor in the first paragraph until I ran a Google search on John Wayne and found him not only to be a critically-acclaimed film director but also an enduring American icon that epitomized rugged masculinity.

Going deeper into the article, the issue of gender discrimination and defining sexuality is one that continuously comes to mind. Be it in the choice of language used to describe Bigelow such as drag and transvestite and the specific aspects of the film brought up like family and relationships, readers are drawn into questioning the assumptions and even the very definitions of contestable terms, in particular, feminism and masculinity.

"Popularity May Have Doomed Chinese Talent Show" - A view through the eyes of a Westerner?

The irony in the title really got me intrigued about this article. It made me think more deeply about how popularity (in terms of viewership, online followers and high ratings) could actually be a double-edged sword when there are issues of concern about mass media and culture. As I continued reading, I find that this article, in spite of my initial high expectations, was suspiciously biased and came across as a little condescending. I might be going out on a limb to say this, but it seems to me that the author is packaging the article in a way that caters to the prevailing mindset amongst the majority of the New York Times readers (the American public).

Not only does he use many terms with negative connotations to describe the show like “knock-off” and “cringe-worthy”, he also purposefully uses the words of the government officials in such a way that readers will tend to perceive the Chinese government in a bad light. Considering the way he organizes the facts, quotes and the overall structure of the article, he portrays the image of a despotic and dictatorial regime so paranoid that it can feel threatened by even the slightest stirring of social dissent through a mere television show.

1.

Tuesday 10 January 2012

"Imam Muda" (Finale) [English subbed]

In 100 words or less...

After reading the article about "Imam Muda", I find it intriguing how the concepts of religion and leadership come across. While the show appears to be a popular hit amongst audiences, I am skeptical of the impact it actually has on people's perception and views about Islam itself. Does the value of the sermons from the show really stay with them or are they treated simply as part of the program and forgotten as soon as the show is over? More importantly, I feel the religion is deeply personal and intimate experience and a television show is somewhat ineffective (and to some extent, inappropriate) in expressing the values and beliefs that can only be truly understood when personally experienced. Furthermore, a mere ten weeks of so-called practical tasks and intellectual debate is just not good enough to gauge someone's character as well as leadership capabilities as people change and leaders are made not born.

(oh man. burst by 54...)

Is Islam truly the star of this show? How has concepts about religion and leadership come across?

An interesting variation of reality TV tried-and-true formula, “Imam Muda” or “Young Leader”, hopes to make Islam more relevant to the lives of young people and extending the role of religious leaders beyond the mosque. Judging from the overall positive feedback and the alternative female version spin-offs, it seems like the show has managed to achieve visible results in terms of its popularity. However, as I read (and re-read) the article, it brings to my mind certain points that I believe are worth discussing about.

While taking the measure of the show’s popularity and success to be the high viewership it receives as well as the number of fans following it on Facebook (over a cool 400 000 to date), the question remains how these numbers are a true reflection of the results it hopes to achieve – raising awareness about Islam and making the religion more relevant today. This is because even though the numbers have exploded since the show’s humble beginnings in 2010 and the show remains Astro Oasis highest rated program ever, it can still be a little premature to take it as evidence of how involved and engaged the masses are with the religion itself. After all, just like all other reality TV shows, “Imam Muda” attracts audiences with thrill of a life-changing experience as well as the promise of fame and stardom for the winner. But when the show is over and people walk away from the television screen, are they really going to be better able to relate to their religious leaders in the future?

Perhaps a better way to illustrate this point of mine would be to draw reference to the unfortunate cancellation of one of my favorite American comedic sitcoms of all time (something I am still very sorry about until this day), Outsourced. Despite ranking #1 among ABC, CBS and other networks as well as receiving nominations for acclaimed awards such as the People’s Choice, it was canned after its one and only season. Even though the show may have been a quite a charming production, according to Alessandra Stanley, the TV critic of The New York Times, having a great viewership ratings, reviews and even award nominations are not strong enough criteria to deem whether a program is really able to deliver the results among its audiences that it is looking for.

On a more personal level, I believe religion and its beliefs are something that it is deeply personal. I myself am a Christian and for me, I see my relationship with God as a personal journey of faith. While I do enjoy the uplifting praise and worship sessions, fellowship with my cell group and Sunday services, how I interpret my religion is still a matter of my personal choice. I find it doubtful that a television show, other than commercial breaks, with its limited airtime and not to mention continuity in terms of the contestant changing season after season, is able to bring the level of intimacy and closeness that a relationship is to its audience. I appreciate the fact that the producers seek to bring the delivery of sermons (something people usually see as boring) more interesting such that it will appeal to the younger generation, I believe that the quality of the message which the leaders hope to express ends up getting compromised instead because of all the constraints.

Last but not least, perhaps the one thing that troubles me the most about this show is the prize itself – the job offer of an imam, a leader. A leader has to be tried and tested through the trials of time and other tribulations. A time frame of mere ten weeks and the so-called practical tasks and intellectual tests are simply not enough to gauge if someone is suitable to lead. The experiences, such as preparing the unclaimed corpses for burial, and the adulation and adoration of the masses following the program which come with winning may all seem memorable and wonderful at first. But a true leader, regardless of it being in the community or in religion, has to keep the passion for his/her cause going in spite of the setbacks, obstacles and frustrations there may be along the long road ahead.